Important editorials from The Assam Tribune explained in simple language, connected with wider concepts, and converted into useful arguments for APSC and UPSC Mains answers.
Understand the issues first
Ultra right’s rise
The editorial examines the rise of the far right in Europe through the electoral success of Germany’s Alternative for Germany (AfD) in Saxony-Anhalt. It argues that the growing influence of ultra-right politics is not limited to one country and is increasingly pushing mainstream political parties towards stricter positions on immigration, border security and deportation.
Read the Analysis →The rise of the ultra-right reflects growing voter discontent, but its influence can also push mainstream parties towards harder positions on immigration and border security.
Fish diversity
The editorial highlights the documentation of 112 fish species in the Sadiya landscape and explains why eastern Assam is an important repository of indigenous freshwater biodiversity. It warns that rare fish entering local markets, ornamental fish collection, destructive fishing practices, habitat degradation and climate change can threaten this diversity, requiring scientific monitoring, sustainable aquaculture and community participation.
Read the Analysis →Conserving Assam’s freshwater fish diversity requires scientific documentation, sustainable fishing, long-term monitoring, appropriate aquaculture and active community participation.
A ticking seismic time bomb
The editorial examines the potential risks associated with China’s Medog Dam on the Yarlung Tsangpo near the Paizhen fault and its implications for Arunachal Pradesh and Assam. It connects seismic activity, landslides, glacier loss, glacial lake outburst floods, downstream vulnerability and large-scale hydropower development, while arguing for greater attention to ecological sustainability and diversified energy sources.
Read the Analysis →Himalayan disaster risk cannot be separated from the interaction between seismic activity, unstable slopes, glaciers, water systems and large infrastructure.
Sheikh Hasina dilemma for India
The editorial examines the difficult phase in India-Bangladesh relations created by India’s decision to shelter former Bangladesh Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina. It explores the historical basis of India’s relationship with Hasina, Bangladesh’s growing engagement with China and Pakistan, the strategic importance of Bangladesh for India’s Northeast, and the need for New Delhi to balance its historical relationship with wider national and regional interests.
Read the Analysis →India must protect its historical relationship with Sheikh Hasina without allowing the issue to obstruct its long-term strategic engagement with Bangladesh.
Ultra right’s rise
The editorial uses the electoral success of Germany’s AfD in Saxony-Anhalt as a wider illustration of the growing influence of ultra-right politics in Europe. Its deeper concern is not merely the success of one political party, but the possibility that the rise of the far right may reshape mainstream political discourse and push established parties towards increasingly restrictive positions on immigration, borders and deportation.
The rise of the far right is becoming a wider European political phenomenon
The editorial begins with the electoral victory of Germany’s Alternative for Germany, or AfD, in the eastern State of Saxony-Anhalt. The party won 44 percent of the seats, falling three short of a majority.
The significance of the result goes beyond the formation of a State government. The editorial treats the outcome as evidence that far-right politics is gaining electoral space in a country where established mainstream parties have traditionally dominated political competition.
The concern is therefore about a broader political shift: when dissatisfaction among voters increases, political parties advocating harder positions on immigration and national identity can gain support.
Electoral success can transform the political influence of the ultra-right
The editorial describes AfD as a party with a strong anti-immigration position and notes that its leaders have been accused of being Islamophobic, antisemitic and antidemocratic. The editorial also refers to the German intelligence agency having labelled AfD an extremist party.
Winning 44 percent of the seats gives the party significant political weight. If it succeeds in forming a coalition with other parties, it could exercise considerable influence over areas such as immigration, education and other domestic policies.
Electoral success → Political influence → Policy influence → Wider mainstream impact
Voter dissatisfaction can weaken established political forces
Saxony-Anhalt had voted for Germany’s ruling Christian Democratic Union, or CDU, in the previous parliamentary election. The electoral success of AfD therefore represents a major setback for the established political order in the State.
The editorial also connects the CDU’s poor performance with the declining approval rating of Chancellor Friedrich Merz.
This demonstrates how dissatisfaction with mainstream political parties can create political space for alternative forces, including parties positioned further towards the political right.
- Declining confidence in established parties can reshape electoral competition.
- Regional election results can become indicators of wider political trends.
- Voter dissatisfaction can strengthen parties positioned outside the traditional political mainstream.
- Political polarisation can intensify when established parties lose electoral space to more radical alternatives.
The trend extends beyond Germany
The editorial argues that the implications of the Saxony-Anhalt result extend beyond Germany because right-wing populist and far-right parties have increased their influence across Europe.
It refers to right-wing parties holding governing power or acting as coalition partners in countries including Italy, Finland, Croatia and Czechia.
The editorial also points to the growing strength of the National Rally in France, the Freedom Party in Austria, Chega in Portugal and Reform UK in Britain.
Taken together, these developments indicate that the rise of right-wing politics is not an isolated national phenomenon but a broader political development across Europe.
Immigration has become a major political fault line
Immigration is central to the political appeal of many ultra-right movements discussed in the editorial.
These parties have used concerns surrounding immigration, national identity and border control to mobilise voter support. The editorial argues that this has consequences even beyond the electoral success of the far right.
Mainstream centre-right and centre-left parties are increasingly adopting stricter policies on immigration, border security and deportations in response to voter discontent.
Far-right pressure → Voter discontent → Mainstream parties harden immigration policies
The influence of the far right can extend even without direct control of government
One of the editorial’s most important arguments is that the political impact of the ultra-right should not be measured only by whether such parties directly form governments.
Their electoral strength can force established parties to modify their own policies in order to retain voters.
Consequently, the political agenda itself may shift towards stricter immigration controls, stronger border policies and tougher approaches to deportation.
This creates a more subtle form of political influence: a party can alter the policy debate even without controlling the entire government.
Political polarisation can reshape democratic debate
The editorial presents the rise of the ultra-right as a warning about a potentially more divisive political era.
When political competition increasingly revolves around identity, immigration and national security concerns, the space for consensus-oriented politics can become narrower.
The issue is therefore not simply left versus right. The deeper concern is whether political competition can remain democratic, pluralistic and capable of accommodating differences without turning political disagreement into permanent polarisation.
Addressing voter concerns without normalising extremism is the central challenge
The editorial is critical of the growth of the ultra-right, but the underlying political challenge is that voter concerns cannot simply be ignored.
If concerns relating to immigration, borders and social change remain politically unresolved, they can continue to create electoral opportunities for radical parties.
At the same time, responding to such concerns by adopting increasingly extreme positions can shift the political centre itself towards exclusionary policies.
The challenge for democratic politics is therefore to respond to legitimate public concerns while protecting pluralism and democratic values.
How can democratic politics respond to the ultra-right?
- Address genuine public concerns about immigration through evidence-based policy rather than polarising rhetoric.
- Strengthen democratic institutions and political accountability.
- Maintain political pluralism and reject discrimination against communities.
- Improve communication between mainstream parties and voters.
- Address the social and political causes of voter dissatisfaction.
- Prevent legitimate policy debates from being captured by extremist narratives.
- Preserve democratic dialogue even during periods of intense political polarisation.
One idea to carry into the exam
The rise of the ultra-right in Europe reflects the growing political importance of voter dissatisfaction, particularly around immigration and border security. Its greatest influence may lie not only in winning elections but also in forcing mainstream parties to adopt increasingly restrictive positions, making the protection of democratic pluralism an important challenge.
Fish diversity
The editorial uses the documentation of 112 fish species in the Sadiya landscape to highlight the ecological importance of eastern Assam’s freshwater ecosystems. It argues that biodiversity conservation cannot be reduced to restricting fishing; it must combine scientific documentation, monitoring, regulation, sustainable aquaculture, conservation of indigenous species and meaningful participation of fishing communities.
Sadiya is more than a fishing ground
The documentation of 112 fish species demonstrates the biological richness of the Sadiya landscape.
The editorial emphasises that the rivers, wetlands and water bodies of eastern Assam are repositories of indigenous freshwater life and therefore have ecological as well as economic importance.
Fish diversity supports livelihoods, but the same economic value can also create pressure on wild fish populations when rare or conservation-significant species enter markets.
Conservation must distinguish sustainable fishing from indiscriminate collection
The editorial does not argue for restricting fishing as a whole. Instead, it calls for a scientifically informed framework that distinguishes sustainable fishing from the indiscriminate collection of rare and threatened species.
This distinction is important because fishing is an economic activity and an important livelihood, while indiscriminate collection can damage ecological diversity.
Sustainable Fishing ≠ Indiscriminate Collection
Economic demand can create conservation pressure
The editorial raises concern about rare fish being found in local markets and ornamental species attracting commercial collection and trafficking.
This creates a direct link between biodiversity and markets. Species that become commercially valuable can face increased collection pressure.
Conservation policy must therefore understand not only what species exist but also how they enter markets and whether commercial demand is affecting their populations.
Existing fisheries regulations need effective enforcement
The editorial calls for a review and effective enforcement of existing fisheries regulations.
It specifically refers to destructive practices such as battery-operated electric fishing, which can damage aquatic ecosystems and fish populations.
This demonstrates an important governance principle: conservation laws have limited value when destructive practices continue because of weak enforcement.
- Review existing fisheries regulations.
- Enforce provisions against destructive fishing practices.
- Monitor commercial collection of rare species.
- Use market information to identify emerging conservation threats.
Documentation must become continuous monitoring
Recording species is only the first step. The editorial argues that long-term monitoring is necessary to understand changes in species abundance and population trends.
It proposes a periodic fish-diversity programme involving the Fisheries Department, ICAR institutions, the KVK network, the College of Fisheries at Raha, CIFRI’s North East Regional Centre and the National Bureau of Fish Genetic Resources.
Such collaboration can create a reliable database that helps identify changes before they become irreversible.
Documentation → Database → Monitoring → Threat Detection → Policy Response
Biodiversity loss can result from multiple pressures
The editorial identifies several pressures that require monitoring, including overfishing, habitat degradation and climate change.
These pressures may interact rather than operate independently. Declining habitat quality can weaken fish populations, while excessive fishing can further reduce their ability to recover.
Climate-related changes can add another layer of stress to freshwater ecosystems.
Aquaculture can reduce pressure on wild fish stocks
The editorial argues that research should go beyond counting species and examine hydrobiological conditions in individual water bodies.
Such assessment can help determine what forms of aquaculture are suitable and at what intensity.
Diversification of species and aquaculture practices can reduce pressure on wild stocks while supporting livelihoods.
- Assess the hydrobiological conditions of individual water bodies.
- Select aquaculture practices according to local ecological conditions.
- Avoid excessive aquaculture intensity.
- Diversify aquaculture practices where appropriate.
- Reduce dependence on vulnerable wild fish populations.
Endangered indigenous fish need active conservation measures
The editorial calls for standard breeding protocols for endangered indigenous species so that depleted populations can be conserved and propagated.
This moves conservation beyond passive protection. Where populations have already declined, scientific breeding and propagation can become part of a broader recovery strategy.
Fishers must become partners in conservation
Conservation measures are unlikely to succeed if fishing communities are treated only as subjects of regulation.
The editorial therefore argues that fishers should be partners in conservation programmes.
Awareness initiatives can demonstrate that protecting rare fish is not opposed to livelihoods. Instead, healthy fish populations and functioning ecosystems can help sustain livelihoods over the long term.
Protect Fish → Protect Ecosystem → Protect Livelihoods
Conservation and livelihoods should reinforce each other
A purely restrictive approach to fishing could create difficulties for communities dependent on fisheries.
On the other hand, unrestricted exploitation can gradually weaken the ecological foundation on which those livelihoods depend.
The stronger approach is therefore to distinguish sustainable fishing from destructive practices, support scientific monitoring, promote suitable aquaculture and involve fishers in conservation.
Building a sustainable freshwater biodiversity framework
- Establish periodic fish-diversity monitoring programmes.
- Build reliable databases of species, abundance and population trends.
- Document fish entering local markets to identify emerging threats.
- Enforce regulations against destructive fishing practices.
- Assess hydrobiological conditions before promoting aquaculture.
- Diversify aquaculture practices to reduce pressure on wild stocks.
- Develop breeding protocols for endangered indigenous species.
- Make fishing communities active partners in conservation.
- Strengthen awareness regarding the ecological and livelihood value of fish diversity.
One idea to carry into the exam
Assam’s freshwater biodiversity requires a balance between ecological conservation and livelihood security. Scientific documentation, long-term monitoring, effective regulation, sustainable aquaculture, conservation of indigenous species and community participation can together protect fish diversity while sustaining the communities that depend upon aquatic ecosystems.
A ticking seismic time bomb
The editorial examines the potential risks associated with the Medog Dam on the Yarlung Tsangpo and connects them with the seismic, geological, glacial and hydrological vulnerability of the eastern Himalayas. Its larger argument is that infrastructure development, disaster risk and ecological sustainability cannot be considered separately, particularly when upstream developments can have downstream consequences for Arunachal Pradesh and Assam.
A large upstream project can create downstream strategic and disaster risks
The editorial discusses China’s construction of the Medog Dam on the Yarlung Tsangpo river, the river that becomes the Siang after entering Arunachal Pradesh and later the Brahmaputra in Assam.
The project is described as a 60,000-megawatt hydropower mega-project targeted to begin operations by 2033.
The editorial’s concern arises from the location of the project near the Paizhen fault, described as an active geological fracture in a highly earthquake-prone part of the eastern Himalayas.
Earthquakes can interact with unstable mountain slopes and river systems
The editorial refers to the 2017 magnitude 6.9 earthquake near the northern end of the Paizhen fault and notes that the tremor triggered between 700 and 1,800 co-seismic landslides.
These landslides affected the steep slopes and the great bend of the Yarlung Tsangpo Gorge. Large quantities of debris partially blocked the river, temporarily creating dammed lakes and altering downstream water levels.
The editorial uses this historical event to illustrate how an earthquake can trigger a chain of secondary processes rather than producing only direct shaking.
Earthquake → Landslides → Debris → River Blockage → Water-Level Change → Downstream Risk
The Yarlung Tsangpo–Siang–Brahmaputra connection makes the issue regionally important
The editorial stresses the geographical continuity of the river system. The Yarlung Tsangpo becomes the Siang after entering Arunachal Pradesh and subsequently forms the Brahmaputra in Assam.
Consequently, an upstream event can potentially have downstream implications far beyond the location where the triggering event occurs.
The editorial also highlights the absence of a water-sharing treaty between China and India and argues that India does not have access to real-time information or advance warning regarding upstream discharges.
Glacier loss can add another layer of Himalayan disaster risk
The editorial does not treat the dam as an isolated engineering concern. It connects the issue with wider changes in the Himalayan cryosphere.
It notes the loss of 20 percent of glacier area in the Himalayan region of India and Nepal over a period of 30 years.
The editorial argues that glacier loss and warming can increase the possibility of glacial lake outburst floods, creating another pathway through which water and debris can suddenly move downstream.
Glacier Loss → More Meltwater → Fragile Lakes → GLOF Risk → Downstream Flooding
Himalayan lakes can become sources of sudden downstream hazards
The editorial describes glacial lakes as potentially dangerous when their walls are unstable and water accumulates behind them.
It refers to the 2023 South Lhonak lake event in Sikkim as an example of a GLOF causing severe flash floods and damage.
According to the editorial, excessive rain, seismic disturbances, the release of excess water or other factors can potentially destabilise such systems.
The central lesson is that Himalayan hazards are interconnected: seismic activity, glaciers, slopes, lakes and rivers can interact to produce cascading consequences.
Large infrastructure can amplify natural hazards
The editorial invokes the 1975 Banqiao Dam failure in China as a historical warning about the consequences of cascading infrastructure failure.
It describes how Typhoon Nina produced extremely heavy rainfall, causing the Banqiao Dam to breach and release large quantities of water downstream. The resulting flooding contributed to the collapse of 62 downstream dams.
The editorial uses this example to argue that infrastructure systems must be evaluated not only individually but also for the possibility of cascading failures.
Energy security must be balanced with ecological and disaster risks
The editorial recognises that India, Nepal, China and other countries in the region require large amounts of electricity and energy for development.
However, it questions whether energy requirements should be met primarily through a limited number of very large hydropower projects in ecologically and geologically sensitive regions.
The argument is not against development itself. Rather, it calls for greater diversification of energy sources so that energy security does not become excessively dependent on high-risk infrastructure.
Diversifying the energy mix can reduce dependence on large dams
The editorial highlights the rapid increase in India’s installed solar power capacity and argues that scientific and policy attention should focus on integrating solar, wind and geothermal energy into traditional power grids.
The central idea is diversification. Instead of relying disproportionately on large hydropower projects, a broader mix of energy sources can contribute to energy security.
This also connects energy policy with ecological sustainability and disaster risk management.
Development decisions involve trade-offs between economic and human costs
The editorial refers to the ONGC Puga project in Ladakh as an example of an alternative energy approach that faces obstacles such as high initial capital costs.
It argues that sustainable development must consider the trade-off between capital costs and human and ecological costs.
The deeper philosophical argument is that sustainability should focus on the long-term endurance and balance of ecological systems, rather than treating environmental concerns as secondary to short-term development objectives.
Development → Energy Need → Infrastructure → Ecological Cost → Human Cost → Sustainability
Energy development is necessary, but risk-sensitive planning is equally necessary
The editorial acknowledges the enormous energy requirements of developing societies.
At the same time, it argues that the location and scale of infrastructure matter greatly when projects are situated in earthquake-prone and environmentally sensitive mountain systems.
The policy challenge is therefore not development versus environment in absolute terms. It is about designing development in a way that accounts for ecological limits, disaster risk and long-term sustainability.
Building a more risk-sensitive Himalayan development strategy
- Strengthen assessment of seismic risks before major infrastructure development.
- Consider landslide and downstream flood risks together with earthquake risks.
- Strengthen monitoring of glaciers and glacial lakes.
- Improve access to upstream river-flow information and warning mechanisms.
- Consider cascading infrastructure failures during project planning.
- Diversify the energy mix through solar, wind and geothermal sources.
- Integrate renewable energy into existing power grids.
- Incorporate ecological and human costs into development decisions.
- Treat Himalayan ecosystems as interconnected systems rather than isolated project sites.
One idea to carry into the exam
Himalayan infrastructure planning must recognise the interaction of seismic activity, landslides, glaciers, water systems and downstream vulnerability. Energy security should therefore be pursued through risk-sensitive planning, ecological sustainability and diversification of energy sources rather than through an exclusive dependence on large-scale hydropower.
Sheikh Hasina dilemma for India
The editorial examines the delicate phase in India-Bangladesh relations following India’s decision to shelter former Bangladesh Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina. It argues that while historical ties and India’s relationship with Hasina remain important, Bangladesh’s geographical, economic, security and connectivity significance means that India must maintain engagement with the present Bangladeshi government and prevent the Hasina issue from defining the entire bilateral relationship.
India-Bangladesh relations are being tested by a politically sensitive issue
The editorial describes India-Bangladesh relations as having entered a delicate and uncertain phase because of the question of former Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina.
The two countries were previously described as having a model relationship built around history, geography, security and mutual economic interests.
The present dispute demonstrates how changes in domestic politics in one neighbouring country can create difficult choices for another country even when long-term strategic interests remain closely interconnected.
India faces a diplomatic balancing act over Sheikh Hasina
The editorial explains that Bangladesh has repeatedly demanded Sheikh Hasina’s return, while India has provided her refuge.
Dhaka’s objections became stronger after Hasina addressed Bangladesh virtually from India. Bangladesh viewed India’s decision to provide her a platform as evidence of continuing political support.
For India, however, the relationship with Hasina is rooted in historical circumstances and a long-standing political connection.
Historical Relationship + Present Political Reality → Diplomatic Balancing
India’s relationship with Sheikh Hasina has deep historical roots
The editorial traces India’s relationship with Sheikh Hasina back to 1975, following the assassination of Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, Bangladesh’s founding leader, along with most members of his family.
At that time, Hasina and her husband were in West Germany and sought assistance from Prime Minister Indira Gandhi because of concerns about their safety. India provided them refuge and Hasina remained in the country for several years.
This history helps explain why the present issue is not viewed in New Delhi simply as a temporary diplomatic matter.
India-Bangladesh ties extend far beyond political leadership
The editorial emphasises that contemporary bilateral relations involve much more than political friendships.
India and Bangladesh are interconnected through trade, security, water resources, transport, energy and geography.
Bangladesh is also one of India’s important economic partners in South Asia, while the countries share a long international land border.
This means that a temporary political dispute should not be allowed to destroy broader institutional and strategic relationships.
Bangladesh’s growing engagement with China and Pakistan adds strategic complexity
The editorial identifies Bangladesh’s growing engagement with China as a major concern for New Delhi.
Bangladesh has expanded strategic and economic relations with Beijing, including cooperation involving infrastructure projects and ports.
The editorial also points to Bangladesh’s efforts to rebuild relations with Pakistan, including increased military exchanges and reported interest in Pakistan’s JF-17 Thunder fighter aircraft.
Bangladesh’s possible participation in the Mecca Defence Pact is presented as another development with potential strategic implications.
Bangladesh’s China Engagement + Pakistan Outreach → Greater Strategic Attention in New Delhi
Bangladesh is strategically important for India’s Northeast
The editorial gives special importance to Bangladesh because of its geographical relationship with India’s Northeast.
The Northeast is connected to the rest of India through the Siliguri Corridor, while Bangladesh offers potentially shorter and more efficient road, rail and inland-waterway connections.
Projects such as the Akhaura-Agartala railway link and access to Bangladeshi ports such as Chattogram and Mongla demonstrate the strategic value of Bangladesh for Northeast connectivity.
Therefore, deterioration in India-Bangladesh relations can have consequences beyond bilateral diplomacy and directly affect connectivity and regional development in the Northeast.
Geography makes Bangladesh an important connectivity partner
The editorial stresses that Bangladesh can provide India with potentially shorter routes to the Northeast through roads, railways and inland waterways.
This creates economic and strategic value because improved connectivity can support movement of people, goods and energy while strengthening the integration of the Northeast with the wider Indian economy.
Bangladesh’s location therefore makes the relationship important irrespective of which political party or leader is in power.
Shared rivers make bilateral relations environmentally and politically sensitive
The editorial notes the political sensitivity surrounding shared rivers such as the Teesta and the implementation of the Ganga Water Treaty.
Water resources are therefore another area where sustained communication between India and Bangladesh remains essential.
This demonstrates how geography creates permanent areas of interdependence even when political relations become strained.
Stable relations with Bangladesh are important for India’s wider security environment
The editorial argues that the Bangladesh question is not merely a matter of diplomacy but also one of national security.
Bangladesh’s geographical location, its relationship with India’s Northeast and its growing external strategic partnerships make stable bilateral relations important for New Delhi.
The editorial therefore argues that India cannot afford to allow political differences surrounding Sheikh Hasina to push Bangladesh decisively towards an adversarial position.
Existing bilateral achievements provide a foundation for engagement
The editorial points to several achievements during Sheikh Hasina’s tenure that demonstrate the depth of bilateral cooperation.
These include the 2013 Extradition Treaty, which facilitated cooperation relating to cross-border crime, insurgency and fugitives.
It also refers to the 2015 Land Boundary Agreement, which resolved a longstanding territorial problem involving 162 enclaves and provided legal citizenship to thousands of previously stateless people.
These examples show that India-Bangladesh relations have produced concrete institutional outcomes that should not be discarded because of present political disagreements.
India must separate long-term interests from immediate political disputes
The editorial recommends that New Delhi keep communication channels open with the present Bangladeshi government.
At the same time, this does not require India to abandon its relationship with Sheikh Hasina or the historical relationship associated with the Awami League.
The central diplomatic challenge is therefore to manage both relationships simultaneously without allowing one issue to dominate the entire bilateral relationship.
Protect Historical Ties + Engage Present Government + Preserve Long-Term Strategic Interests
India’s objective should be relationship continuity, not political alignment
The editorial does not argue that India must choose between supporting Sheikh Hasina and engaging Bangladesh.
Instead, it argues for a broader diplomatic approach in which India recognises that governments change, political ideologies shift and leaders come and go, while geography remains constant.
India’s long-term interest therefore lies in maintaining engagement with Bangladesh even when political differences are significant.
Protecting the long-term India-Bangladesh relationship
- Keep diplomatic and communication channels open with the present Bangladeshi government.
- Prevent the Sheikh Hasina issue from defining the entire bilateral relationship.
- Preserve historical relationships while recognising changing political realities.
- Strengthen connectivity between Bangladesh and India’s Northeast.
- Continue cooperation in trade, energy, transport and security.
- Address politically sensitive shared-river issues through sustained dialogue.
- Protect the institutional achievements of bilateral cooperation.
- Monitor the strategic implications of Bangladesh’s growing engagement with other major powers.
- Follow a pragmatic neighbourhood policy based on long-term national interests rather than temporary political equations.
One idea to carry into the exam
India’s relationship with Bangladesh is too deeply connected to geography, security, trade, water resources and Northeast connectivity to be defined by the Sheikh Hasina issue alone. India should maintain its historical relationship with Hasina while keeping communication open with Bangladesh’s present government and protecting its long-term strategic interests.
What are they really saying?
How should you use today’s editorials?
Now use the ideas
Based on today’s editorials
The rise of the ultra-right in Europe is influencing not only electoral politics but also the policy positions of mainstream parties. Discuss.
The conservation of freshwater biodiversity requires a balance between ecological protection and livelihood security. Discuss with reference to Assam’s fish diversity.
Himalayan disasters can emerge from the interaction of seismic, geological, glacial and hydrological processes. Examine the disaster and development risks associated with large infrastructure in such regions.
India-Bangladesh relations are shaped by history, geography, security, connectivity and changing regional geopolitics. Discuss how India should balance its relationship with Bangladesh amid the Sheikh Hasina issue.
Four editorials in four chains
Editorial analysis prepared for APSC, UPSC and ADRE preparation. The purpose is to understand the arguments and concepts raised by the editorials and convert them into balanced, exam-relevant analytical points.